WP3: Statement of Purpose

Assessing a sculpture, especially one as complex as “Story” can seem like a daunting task. The three main concepts to consider when forming a purpose are medium, context, and audience. All of these play a vital role in supporting an argument that the viewer can assess.

Out of all types of art, sculptures have the most freedom and flexibility when comes to choice of medium. A single substance may be used or a conglomeration of materials can be forged together to create an image. In the case of “Story” a single substance, aluminum, is uniformly distributed throughout the sculpture. This is a common element in today’s society and can be seen fairly clearly in all degrees of brightness. On a sunny day aluminum can brighten the area around it by reflecting sun rays or cast lengthy shadows on both itself and the ensuing ground. Being both light and thin, aluminum portrays a fragile ethos that is easily swayed with the slightest gust of wind. This increases its ability to be manipulated and contributes to King’s affinity with disproportionate body parts. One important factor to consider is that the sculpture is man-made evidenced by the bolts connecting both the base and foot to a concrete block. The modern materials juxtapose greatly with the surrounding green grass.

After analyzing the medium of the sculpture, one must analyze the medium of the writing project. I will be writing a letter to my sculpture which implies a certain sense of familiarity between the two of us. It will be a challenge to both inquire about the recent activity of my friend and analyze its rhetorical strategies. Use of flashbacks and references to his father (William King) will be in order to smoothly concatenate both concepts.

Context plays a major role in this sculpture’s argument, most notably in its outside presence. It is vulnerable to the elements and therefore must exhibit a certain degree of sustainability. Even though “Story” is made out of thin aluminum, it still holds up even during the winter months. The straight cut sets of the sculpture enable rain drops to just roll off the surface without any lasting impact. Along with the aesthetical context, there is the historical context to consider. William King was very partial to long-legged figures and was extremely fond of his mother. He also liked to portray figures in an everyday gesture, which in this sculpture is embodied by the cigarette. Knowing the background of the artist can significantly help with uncovering the argument.

Finally, I will need to consider my audience when conjuring up this letter. My primary audiences are “Story” since I am addressing the letter to it and Mr. Ware because he will be evaluating my letter. There are numerous secondary audiences such as my peers, people strolling by during my reading, and anyone with internet access. Letters are personal pieces of writing and usually contain subtleties that only the two correspondents are familiar with. I must walk a fine line between creating a personal relationship between “Story” and me and making it accessible to an average person with limited art experience.

By considering the medium of my piece and letter, context of my sculpture, and multiple audiences I can develop a statement of purpose. My goal is to show that “Story” is a stereotypical King piece that embodies his prominent methods post-“Self”. It can be viewed through multiple lenses including historical and contextual. The wacky proportions of “Story” embody King’s strange journey through life and how he sees the world.

WP3: Fourth Post

After researching the background of my sculpture and its sculptor, my perceptions of “Story” have altered dramatically. William King grew up in Florida where his father was an engineer and his mother a school teacher. He father actually built the house that they lived in which inspired William’s brother Blake to become an engineer. His father dealt with many bits and pieces and was able to construct them in a suitable manner. This heavily influenced King’s work through set pieces that had slots to connect them. Researchers have divided King’s career into two sections, before “Self” and after “Self”. During his first ten years he constructed sculptures that were based on observations of people. He used abstraction to convey satirical or political arguments. However, most of these pieces were one entity and were made out of similar materials. The 1957 sculpture “Self” was a career defining creation that embodied both his past work (abstraction of observations) and future work (attached and assembled creations). I feel as if “Story” and “Self” are cousins because the both employ long legs, a fragile appearance, a uniform outer skin, and a mock-hero contemplating his life story.

King had many influences in his life, but one of the most prominent was his mother. Viewed as a powerful and respected woman by King, his mother told him to follow whatever path he wanted. One grand example of this is when his mother gave him $100 and told him not to come back to Florida for 20 years. She wanted him to chase his dream of becoming an artist and for him to create his own path. It seems that he had a deeper connection with his mother than his father, possibly because his father worked long hours and was more compatible with his brother, Blake. In his sculptures, King portrays women as powerful and confident with abounding charm and delight. Men are shown as exaggerated beings bent on success, even if that requires rudeness or aggression. Women are shown as more straightforward while men will put on “societal disguises” to get what they want. Using this information, I am still a little divided when assessing “Story”. While the sculpture does comply with King’s affinity for “figures of society”, it has attributes of both sexes. Evidence such as the cigarette and disproportionate body parts point to a male character, while the long leg symbolizes power and is usually a trait of women. However, when one factors in that he was heavily influenced by the females in his life the decision leans in the feminine direction.

Overall, this is a classic King piece for the post-“Self” era. It embodies his juxtaposition of human warmth and social artificiality and contains set pieces that have been crudely put together. Taking simple human gestures and flipping their meaning upside down is a King trait that is present in this sculpture. Also, using aluminum helps contribute to a lightweight and delicate feel that appeals to pathos of delight and lightheartedness.

WP3: Third Post

With the sculpture I selected, there are multiple ways to analyze its rhetorical strategies, appeals, and concepts. One prominent feature in the sculpture is the use of shadows. When the shadows change, so does the rhetorical argument. During one session with my sculpture, the shadow from the massive leg made it seem as if the figure was crossing its legs and indeed had two legs. This contributes to the reality of the figure and is interesting that it only occurs at certain time periods during certain days. When viewing the figure from the right side I noticed a multitude of new rhetorical appeals that contribute to a variety of arguments. First of all, I observed that the leg, especially the between the knee and ankle, was extremely emaciated. Yet when I directed my eyes to the foot I was shocked at how elongated it was. The juxtaposition between the elongated foot with a bump on the top and the smooth, thin leg was intriguing and perhaps represents that the first step in doing something is the largest. Another juxtaposition I noticed was between the arm that was in close proximity to the torso and the leg which extended far from the torso. I felt as if there two conflicting feelings within this figure. One persona wanted to stay sitting and relax with a cigarette while the other wanted to leave this safe haven and explore the world. However, it was ironic that the foot was supposed to represent freedom, yet was bolted down, not able to move. The arm was loose and could swing with the wind, yet wanted to stay close to its owner and safety.

When viewing the figure from the side and a little behind I became aware of how prominent the shoulder blade was since it protruded to a great extent. It made me wonder if our shoulder blades really stick out that far. The buttock was also blown out of proportion and had small indentations so it wasn’t a perfect curve. I was intrigued because the shoulder blade gradually descended into the back while the buttock was simply a semi-circle with no smooth connection between it and the torso. This piece tinkers with our normal perceptions of body parts and challenges us to question what is “normal” or “attractive”.

One final concept is the presence of two bumps on top of the cigarette. It is assumed that the viewer recognizes these as two fingers holding the cigarette in place. In society the accepted way to hold a cigarette when smoking it is with one’s index and middle fingers. If one looks closely though, the picture doesn’t make sense. Looking from the side, the cigarette is visible with two bumps above it (the fingers). However, in reality only one finger would be visible with the view of the other one being blocked by the first one. A play on perspective is meant to make sure the audience can identify with the object, even if it’s in an unorthodox way.

WP3: Second Post

“Story” by William King is an intricate piece of art that can be interpreted many different ways. I feel the title plays a prominent role in addressing the argument because not only does the sculpture have a story to tell, but he also observes the stories of the public. Context shapes the argument greatly with the sculpture being outside and susceptible to the elements. There are two buildings, one parallel and the other perpendicular, that are in close proximity to this sculpture creating an enclosed environment. Facing the street creates an ethos of contemplation with the figure observing the lives of everyday people. Many features such as hue and visual hierarchy contribute to appealing to the common man. The entire entity is the same shade of silver with little variation which creates a unity within the piece. Silver can be seen clearly on both light and dark days and is thought of as sort of a middle ground. One example of this “middle ground” is a silver medal which is between a gold and bronze.

With all sculptures, but especially with this one, perspective is important. Looking from the side the only visible parts are the upper arm with a cigarette and the outstretched leg. These prominent features promote leisure and relaxation. Observing the piece from the back reveals more about its rhetorical strategies. Some factors contributing to pathos of relaxation are the fact that the left arm is resting on the stool, the figure is positioned off center, and the cigarette is visible over the top of the shoulder.

The material used to construct something is important when analyzing its argument. This piece is made out of aluminum which is a common element. Again we see how the argument appeals to the common man and his story. Another useful concept to consider is the era in which it was created. “Story” was created in 1970, a time when smoking wasn’t as frowned upon as it is now. People would smoke in the evenings after a hard day’s work in order to relax. I can imagine this figure sitting on the front porch during the evenings and observing the strangers that walked by. One important feature of this piece is that it is hermaphroditic, not focusing on one specific gender. This is an example of a high level of abstraction in order to appeal to a wide audience.

It is always wise to analyze the author along with his creation. “Story” was a gift by Blake King to the Sheldon Art Museum in honor of Norman A. Geske. It is possible that this creation is based on the story of Norman’s life. Maybe he lived a tough, stressful life and finally got to relax during retirement. He story was winding down yet he observed the stories of others from his front porch. Obviously, Norman must have been a positive influence for Blake King to donate this sculpture to the museum. With so many rhetorical strategies in play here, this piece can portray its argument to a diverse and widespread audience.

WP3: First Post

During my lifespan, I have dabbled in many forms of the arts. However, looking over my past I have realized that my experience with art-objects is limited. Most art projects I develop are paintings or drawings, essentially 2-D in nature. Part of the reason I lack experience with three dimensional pieces of art is because it involves more work and materials. With drawing, a pencil and paper are all that is required. Sculptures can entail metals, nails, clay, or plastic. A lot of effort must go into gathering these materials and constructing them. For major sculptures some welding or heavy machinery experience may be necessary. The biggest difference I see between the two dimensional and three dimensional art forms is the ease of creation. Creating what you want is fairly simple with pencil and paper, especially since mistakes can be erased in seconds. This process is much more difficult with art-objects because the material is so durable. Accordingly, it is harder to shape the material into the desired form and even more difficult to undo unwanted actions.


The small collection of art-objects that I have made consists of pottery, puppets, and collages. With pottery it is easier to fix mistakes because the clay is wet and can be mended with ease. Clay can be added or removed which affects the overall end product. During fourth grade I created a paper Mache puppet in the form of a dragon. Using materials such as felt, glue, google eyes, paint, and markers I decorated my magical creation. I had to consider how the puppet looked from all angles, making sure there wasn’t a dip in quality. This is one component that is present in 3-D objects such as sculptures, a 360 degree viewpoint. Finally, I have constructed multiple collages during my academic career. While collages could be considered two dimensional creations, I have made some that have protruding objects creating multiple dimensions.

In my opinion art-objects can be analyzed deeper or at least in a radically different way than more traditional art. The physicality of this type of art contributes to a more realistic feeling that connects with the viewer. Knowing this, I must delve deeper in my analysis of my sculpture than I did in the photograph. One dramatically altered element is context because I must take into account that this sculpture is outside and the reason it was placed in the exact location that it’s in. Sculptures are not as easy to alter as drawings and paintings, but when constructed with care they can portray a very prominent argument. Even with my miniscule art-object background, I realize that there are a multitude of angles that one could analyze a three dimensional piece of art.